In Human Resource Continuity Planning, Certified Products Can Save Lives


Develop Your Human Resource Continuity Plan

Businesses have been preparing for and experiencing disasters and emergencies for as long as commerce has existed. Over the years, this process has focused largely on what is known as business continuity. Simply put, business continuity is the ability to carry on business operations in the wake of natural or man-made disasters or disruptions to normal business activities. Examples such as Katrina and 9/11 come to mind when thinking about the need for business continuity.

Both of these events also offer an opportunity to examine the less-talked-about planning and procedures that businesses must develop to keep employees and on-site personnel safe in the event of any physical emergency or disaster. Human Resource Continuity or HRC for both business and facility management focuses on keeping employees safe and secure in the event of a fire or other workplace emergency.

Developing a focused human resource continuity plan can save lives by ensuring a well-practiced and tested emergency evacuation plan along with the equipment needed to support it, is in place and known by building occupants. The article below will help facilities managers planning for human resource continuity by highlighting the standards, testing and certification to look for when choosing emergency escape equipment to support HRC planning for fire and smoke-based emergencies, where carbon monoxide is one of the most deadly byproducts of combustion.

Buyer Beware

Most emergency escape products for situations, involving fire and smoke, are not certified to any American standard and may not provide the level of protection required to ensure a safe evacuation from a facility. How can HRC planners sift through the noise and misinformation of the emergency protection marketplace to ensure any solution they implement will perform at the levels required to maintain employee safety during an emergency situation?

First and foremost, it is necessary to form evacuation plans that move facility occupants away from the building and to a safe area. A crucial component of any plan is the equipment used to guarantee occupants can escape the area of immediate danger and find safety. The best way to ensure your emergency fire escape equipment is up to standard is to purchase equipment that is certified by Safety Equipment Institute (SEI) to the ANSI / ISEA 110 standard that protects wearers from fire and smoke related contaminants like carbon monoxide and other lethal gases produced by combustion.

By its very nature, any HRC plan must be simple enough for everyone to understand and execute. At the same time, the plan needs to be rigid enough to withstand a situation full of variables, including: panic and mob mentality, blocked exits, corrupted or shifting building infrastructure, and visibility and problems with the building’s air quality. Human resource continuity planning is time-consuming to piece together and implement for an office environment, but even the most resourceful manager can be thoroughly lost in a crisis without one.

Even the best evacuation plan can and will have problems when faced with so many unknowns and variables. Monthly or quarterly fire drills can help, but in panic situations, it’s imperative that evacuees have the tools necessary to get out of a dangerous, life-threatening environment quickly and safely. Having American-certified smoke and fire escape hoods available during an evacuation can help neutralize many of the variables found in an emergency situation, particularly with air quality and visibility. However, most products on the market today are not certified to any standard. If an HRC plan is tested for efficacy, how can an emergency manager be assured that an escape hood will be effective?

Confusion over escape hood options is very real. Since 9/11, the marketplace has been flooded with a number of different products that touted safety during an escape situation. In 2007, responding to this glut of questionable products, the Consumer Product Safety Commission tested a number of off-the-shelf escape products. Not one of these products passed the test.

Consider the Filter – carbon monoxide

The most important part of any escape hood is the filtering system. The most effective escape hoods will have a combination filter to remove a wide range of particulates and gases.

  • The best particulate filter is a high-efficiency particulate air HEPA filter. These will filter 99.97 percent or better of sub-micron particles out of the air.
  • The best gas filters contain a catalyst and impregnated activated charcoal. The catalyst is essential for turning toxic carbon monoxide, the number one cause of deaths during a fire, into non-toxic carbon dioxide. The impregnated activated charcoal works in tandem with the catalyst, removing toxic gases from the wearer’s air supply and mitigating the effects of harmful gases generated by burning materials during a fire.

Setting the Standard

In light of the many sub-standard products on the market, the American ANSI/ISEA Standard 110 was established to ensure fire and smoke escape products provide the protection needed to reach safety in a fire emergency situation. This new ANSI/ISEA standard defines both test criteria and approval methods. It contains general requirements for certification – including ISO registration for the manufacturer, independent process and quality control audits, as well as follow-up inspection programs – and a comprehensive schedule of performance requirements and associated test methods.

Certified Solutions

To earn certification, the product must meet specified requirements for physical characteristics, including:

  • Being tested with a series of combustion byproduct gases, including: carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, acrolein and cyclohexane. 
  • Ease of donning, a full field of vision, radiant heat, exposure to vibration, puncture and tear, as well as extremes of pressure and temperature.

Escape hoods incorporated into an evacuation plan should be certified by the Safety Equipment Institute (SEI), which tests thousands of safety and protective products. SEI currently certifies all NFPA 1981 self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) used by firefighters, first responders and other emergency services personnel.

Incorporating American-certified escape hoods into an HRC plan in an office or building can minimize the number of fatalities and injuries resulting from carbon monoxide poising, smoke inhalation and visibility problems during an emergency situation. However, the product needs to have proven efficacy before it can be added to any plan, meaning that only escape hoods certified by SEI to the ANSI/ISEA 110 standard should be considered. The fire escape hoods that have been certified to this American standard can be found on SEI’s Web site, http://www.seinet.org.

Just as an emergency situation is neither the time nor place to ad-lib an escape plan, it is also no place to find out if a product lives up to its claims. When planning for the human resource side of business continuity and any potential fire and smoke-based emergency, it is important that any emergency escape equipment be readily available, integrated into a well thought out HRC plan, and be certified to the ANSI/ISEA 110 standard by SEI.

Another way to improve your HRC planning and ensure people are able to access the life-saving equipment needed is having proper storage for all emergency equipment. Fire and smoke escape hoods should be stored in an easily accessible location. A preferred method of storage is a cabinet containing no more than 25 hoods with an alarm so any attempt at tampering or theft will be immediately apparent and your HRC investment in staff safety will not be compromised.  Like any planning process, a little research and effort in the early stages will pay huge dividends in the event of any emergency situation and may mean the difference between life and death for building occupants.


“Evaluation of Consumer Personal Protective Equipment: Emergency Escape Masks, October 2007” and “Human Factors Analysis of Consumer Personal Protective Equipment: Emergency Escape Masks, October 2007”